< Back

Network Comparison

National exchange frameworks differ in how they manage trust, routing, and patient discovery.

Health Gorilla handles these variations automatically when you integrate through its APIs, but understanding the differences can help you anticipate data-retrieval behavior and response content across networks.

Feature Comparison

FrameworkKey CharacteristicsRouting and Trust ModelPatient DiscoveryDirectory Behavior
CarequalityProvider-initiated queries using SAML assertions and document-level retrievalSAML-based trust with Implementer-delegated authorizationQueried in real time at requestRequires endpoint publishing and maintenance
CommonWellVendor-based exchange with centralized linking and automated discoveryOAuth-based trust via network brokersPre-linked using deterministic and probabilistic matchingDirectory centrally managed
eHealth ExchangeLegacy network using IHE XCA/XDS protocols for document query and retrievalSAML-based trust via DURSA and direct peer connectionQueried in real time at requestRequires endpoint registration and certificate exchange
TEFCA (QHIN Exchange)Federated framework governed by common national policies and technical standardsQHIN-to-QHIN routing with RLS-based trust and policy enforcementPatient discovery through Record Locator ServicesDirectory managed at QHIN level

Implementation Notes

  • Query Initiation: Carequality and eHealth Exchange use direct query-based exchange; CommonWell uses pre-established patient links; TEFCA supports both real-time and delegated queries.
  • Record Availability: Response content depends on each partner’s participation level, directory accuracy, and data-sharing configuration.
  • Participation Requirements: Only Carequality and TEFCA require participant directory listings and supporting documentation for routing and trust.
  • Health Gorilla’s Role: Health Gorilla serves as an Implementer for Carequality, a Participant in CommonWell and eHealth Exchange, and a designated QHIN under TEFCA.